Showing posts with label Albert the Great. Show all posts

The thirteenth century German-born Dominican, known as Albert the Great even during his lifetime, incurred the wrath of his high-born family when he joined the then recently founded Order of Preachers in 1223. He joined while a student at the University of Padua, and was influenced by Jordan of Saxony, who succeeded Dominic as Master of the Order and whose preaching was remarkably effective in encouraging university students to join the Order.

Over his long life, Albert gave exceptional service as a Dominican, both as a teacher of theology and as an administrator. He founded the house of studies at Cologne, where his pupil Thomas Aquinas was his assistant, and Albert later served as Provincial of Germany. In this post he attended with great care to the needs of Dominican friars in 36 priories, together with many monasteries of Dominican nuns in Germany, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland and the Netherlands. In 1260 he was appointed Bishop of Regensburg, a post he filled for three years. He maintained the simple lifestyle of a mendicant friar, refusing to travel on horseback but walking from place to place – gaining the nickname ‘boots the bishop’. Even in old age he continued to be of service. In 1277 he returned to Paris to defend the works of his pupil Thomas Aquinas, who had died three years earlier, because the then Bishop of Paris was intent on condemning them.

The dominant commitment in Albert’s life was to research, teaching and writing. He wrote on prayer, on the Eucharist, and our Lady, to name three theological subjects, but this article will address principally his output on scientific topics.

As a student in Padua, Albert had encountered the works of Aristotle, and he wrote commentaries on nearly all of Aristotle’s works. He believed that the use of Aristotle’s philosophies would be especially useful in developing the positive Christian vision that understands human life as grace perfecting nature. Aristotle’s view that the study of nature is autonomous in its own domain and worthy of pursuit in its own right fitted well with Albert’s cast of mind and he adopted the Aristotelian approach to the physical world.

EXPERIMENTS

During his years in Cologne, Albert’s reputation as a scientist grew, and he undertook experiments in physics and chemistry in his makeshift laboratory. His endeavours included building up a collection of plants, insects, and chemical compounds, and he was also consulted about the design of Cologne’s new cathedral.As a young man, Albert loved the study of the subject that we now call science. He was very observant, particularly with regard to nature, and he always saw, loved and taught the natural in the context of the supernatural.

Albert merited the title of scientist for two main reasons: first, he examined and treated various topics that can be considered as part of the natural sciences, such as botany, zoology and astronomy; second, he had a real scientific temperament because he based his research on observation, incorporating other researchers’ results when sure of their validity, and he never sought to infer more from scientific data than possible. He is considered to be the first scientist from the West and the greatest biologist since Aristotle.

Albert was blessed with acute powers of observation, which he recorded extensively as a result of his travels in different parts of Europe. He appears to have missed nothing that was worth seeing. He recorded details of fish in the River Danube, cattle, deer, birds, forest squirrels and plants. Of particular interest were Albert’s observations on insects because there were no further reports of this type until the seventeenth century.

Albert was also responsible for anticipating by several centuries some of our more recent discoveries. His writings included details of alchemy, anthropology, architecture, astronomy, botany, climatology, chemistry, mechanics, meteorology, mineralogy, navigation, physics, psychology, weaving and zoology.

It is important to realise that the scientific methods used by this great saint were not those that came to be utilized in subsequent centuries. Albert’s method simply involved observation, description and classification of the phenomena he had studied. His approach paved the way for future research.

The Greek philosopher Aristotle, who lived a quarter of a century before Christ, was the first person to have produced documents of significance in relation to the natural sciences. These texts were somewhat inaccessible, and Albert sought to provide a natural history that would make the Greek philosopher’s writing intelligible. But it is important to note that Albert did not blindly follow Aristotle’s authority. In his philosophical, together with his theological works, the saint does not hesitate to reject certain views that included the eternity of the world, together with observational errors.

One of Albert’s best known botanical writing, the De Vegetabilibus, is considered a masterpiece of its kind. Albert’s work is noteworthy because he grouped together all plants with common essential characteristics, a move that led to the division of flowers into the bird or wing-shaped, the star-shaped and the bell-shaped.

Although Albert began a lot of good work in the natural sciences, he never had the time to pursue it seriously. In many cases, modern scientists have completed that work which he began. For example, he was the first to establish that the sap in the root of a tree is tasteless but that it becomes more flavoured as it ascends, a phenomenon that was subsequently noted at the start of the nineteenth century.

Albert also wrote a zoological treatise entitled De Animalibus, which is based on the work of Aristotle and Avicenna, a Muslim philosopher-scientist. Albert provided detailed descriptions of the fauna he encountered while travelling in Europe. As a result of his observations, he discounted many of the popular myths of his time, such as the idea that a cock in its old age lays an egg from which a serpent is hatched. Despite Albert’s work and observations in this field, his contributions were not really appreciated because he included fabulous creatures in his list of animals. The treatise De Animalibus is not quite so free from medieval myths as is the De Vegetabilibus treatise.

Albert is said to have been the first to describe the dormouse, the martens, the rat, the spook-fish, as well as the weasel. The De Animalibus treatise contains descriptions of animals that include the squirrel (pirolus), the nightingale and the lizard. The description of the squirrel in De Animalibus is as follows:

The pirolus is an extremely lively little animal; it nests in the tops of trees, has a long bushy tail, and swings itself from tree to tree, in doing so using its tail as a rudder. When on the move, it drags its tail behind it, but when sitting it carries it erect up its back. When taking food it holds it as do the other rodents in its hands, so to speak, and places it in its mouth. Its food consists of nuts and fruits and such-like things. Its flesh is sweet and palatable. In Germany, its colour is black when young, and later reddish, in old age it is even partly grey. In Poland it is reddish grey and in parts of Russia quite grey.

This charming description highlights Albert’s characteristic attention to detail and the intensity of his powers of observation.

It is important to realise that during Albert’s time, it was commonly believed that the planet Earth was flat and only inhabited in the northern hemisphere. However, Albert contended that Earth was a sphere by using arguments from the force of gravity. This approach had been previously used by Aristotle. Albert believed in the possibility that the southern zone of Earth could be inhabited, which we know today is true. He also believed that the greater parts of Earth were inhabited, with the exception of the North and South Poles (due to the excessive cold). This contention was later proved to be true. By using arguments from the force of gravity, he proved, as Aristotle had done before him, that the Earth was a sphere. It has also been pointed out that this work of his led eventually to the discovery of America.

Albert also wrote extensively on climate and various aspects of geography. These writings foreshadow many of today’s theories. For example, he attributed the formation of Earth’s crust to a slow cooling of a central fire. Scientists of today refer to the existence of a solid inner core and a liquid outer core that is surrounded by a mantle and crust. He also proposed that mountain ranges arise from upheaval. He correctly traced Europe’s chief mountain chains with their associated rivers. He also mentioned sections of Europe’s coastline that were subsequently submerged by the sea’s action. He detailed islands that were formed by volcanic action and examined the effect of longitude and latitude and other factors in influencing local climate.

Albert provided explanations for observations in physics and astronomy. In physics, he said that sound is caused by the impact of two hard bodies, with the vibration being propagated in the form a sphere whose centre is the point of percussion. Today, we say that sound is propagated through air (or other mediums) as a longitudinal wave, with a sound wave consisting of a periodic variation of pressure occurring around the equilibrium pressure prevailing at a particular place and time. He declared that light is converted into heat on absorption by a body. Albert did not own a telescope (this was a much later invention by Hans Lippershey in 1608), but he decided that the Milky Way must be composed of many stars. In addition, he asserted that the dark spots on the moon were not due to Earth’s shadow but were due to configurations on the surface of the moon.

In anatomy, Albert used the vertebral column as the basis for the skeleton, but in his day, most anatomists began with the skull, which was an approach that persisted for quite some time.

However Albert was no mere theoretician, as he also conducted many experiments, in spite of the fact that he was occupied with other activities. Among his inventions were a hydraulic machine and an apparatus for registering an earthquake. He is credited with having invented the first greenhouse.

Albert was also interested in architecture and produced plans for the Dominican churches of Cologne and Louvain. St Dominic’s Priory in London is modelled on Louvain. In Germany, the saint’s influence was so great on the growth of gothic architecture that this style was called ‘The Albertine Science’ in ancient manuals.

Albert had a strong scientific instinct that was always on the alert. He observed objects that lay around him, not just as an onlooker but with a scientific eye in an effort to investigate ‘natural causes which are the instruments through which the divine will is manifested’ (St Albert). For example, Albert once said that once when eating oysters, he found ten pearls at one meal. This indicates two things: first, he was observant with regard to pearls and second, he seems to have had a large appetite! In fact, as early as 1245, Albert had come to be known as an authority on fish.

What makes Albert ‘great’ as a scientist was that he drew upon the sources of information that his time afforded, particularly the scientific writings of Aristotle. Albert knew that it would have been impossible to prevent the enthusiasm that existed at the time in favour of philosophical studies, so he resolved to purify the works of Aristotle, thereby compelling pagan philosophy to do service in the cause of revealed truth. Albert pursued his scientific studies from the point of view that nature shows signs of divine or cosmic design or purpose. He realised, along with St Paul, that ‘ever since the creation of the world, the invisible existence of God and his everlasting power have been clearly seen by the mind’s understanding of created things.’ (Rom 1:20)

WAS HE AN ALCHEMIST?

As a result of his success in scientific research, many legends grew up about Albert, with the result that he was thought to have a cure for every disease: people of reason would realise that this was impossible. He had written on medicine and so a goblet that he had made was regarded as miraculous. He was also regarded as something of a magician though in fact he was quick to repudiate many of the common medieval myths of the time. There were also some rumours concerning his ability to produce gold by alchemy or his use of the philosopher’s stone, said to be capable of changing base metals such as lead into gold or silver. Some thought it was an elixir of life that could be used to rejuvenate and achieve immortality. The most sought-after goal in alchemy, the stone constituted the central symbol of mystical alchemical terminology. It also symbolised perfection at its finest, enlightenment and heavenly bliss. St Albert, however, did not admit to the possibility of producing the stone as he is quoted as saying, ‘Art alone cannot produce a substantial form’.

Albert therefore earned the reputation of being a magician but in the process earned the contempt of scientists for a period, thereby resulting in a possible perception in some circles of his being somewhat ‘odd’. This would appear to be fair comment up until the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when the process of his rehabilitation began.

In addition, there were some difficulties associated with some of his writings: for example, he included fabulous creatures in his list of animals with the result that his zoological knowledge was underestimated, together with there being an insufficient appreciation of his contributions to the science of zoology.

Albert died on November 15, 1280, and huge crowds attended his funeral, at which Archbishop Siegfried von Westerburg of Cologne officiated. Beatified in 1622, Albert was canonised and declared a doctor of the church in 1931. In 1941 Pope Pius XII declared him patron saint of natural scientists

Deirdre Powell holds qualification in science (PhD in organic chemistry) and in theology.

The article originally appeared in Doctrine & Life, November 2014.

St. Albert the Great: Saintly Scientist for the Modern World

DR. KEVIN VOST

Almost, we can say, like a first Adam on the earth, in the middle of the thirteenth century Albert of Cologne began to look at the world around him with a completely fresh gaze. In his commentary on Matthew’s Gospel he wrote: “The whole world is theology for us because the heavens proclaim the glory of God.”

— Paul Murray, O.P., The New Wine of Dominican Spirituality

Saintly Scientist

Born on earth around 1200 and in heaven in 1280, Saint Albert the Great of the Order of Preachers is a great saint for our time so badly in need of his preaching and teaching. We live in a world where many scientists proclaim their lack of belief in God and increasing numbers of young people declare they believe in science rather than religion, assuming in the ignorance of their miseducation that the two must be opposed. As Pope Saint John Paul II declared in 1998 in his Fides et Ratio (on the relationship between faith and reason), we live in a day when scientism grows rampant and many people believe that science and technology provide all the answers to all the problems that plague humanity. On the other hand, some Christians who recognize that science can certainly tell us how to do things, but not whether we ought to do them, fall into the opposing error of fideism, “which fails to recognize the importance of rational knowledge and philosophical discourse for the understanding of faith, indeed for the very possibility of belief in God.” We live in a day of increasing polarization, presented with the false dichotomy of having to choose between the scientism of the intelligent, courageous, and godless secular scientists and the fideism of ignorant, benighted, and bigoted fundamentalist Bible-thumpers.

The Catholic Church, however, has never been the Church of either-or but of both-and insofar as there are kernels of truth in each side. John Paul II in our time would describe faith and reason as the “two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth.” And among the Catholic faithful throughout the centuries, few have embraced and proclaimed the inherent harmony of science and faith, of reason and revelation, like our hounds of the Lord, true champions of faith and reason, the sons and daughters of Saint Dominic de Guzman.

On November 15, 1980, eighteen years before he released Fides et Ratio, the same saintly pope previewed some of his profound thoughts on the fundamental complementarity of faith and reason in a speech in Cologne, Germany. The occasion was the seven hundredth anniversary of the death of none other than Saint Albert the Great. John Paul II praised Albert for his virtue of courage in championing man’s reason as a grand instrument to find truth and to shape and structure the world, and also for his virtue of humility to recognize reason’s limits and remain “open to the Word of eternal Truth, which became man in Christ.”

Almost thirty years later, in an address on March 24, 2010, Saint John Paul II’s successor, Pope Benedict XVI, would again recommend to us the virtues of Saint Albert, portraying Albert (named the patron saint of scientists by Pope Pius XII in 1941) as a model for modern scientists to follow in transforming the study of nature into a fulfilling and “fascinating journey of holiness.” Indeed, Pope Benedict spoke of the “friendship” of reason and faith, of Saint Albert’s realization that reason and Scripture are completely compatible, and of God’s will that we are to use both to seek and attain truth and happiness.

As when we celebrated the eight hundredth Jubilee of the Orders of Preachers on December 22, 2016, we need the model and lessons of Saint Albert even more as the world questions and “deconstructs” moral and existential truths that seemed to be settled ages ago. “What does it mean to be a man or a woman?” “What is the nature of marriage?” “Do things really have identities or natures of their own, or is everything a matter of change and flux, of feelings and shifting opinions?” “Can truth be determined by a vote or by a show of hands?” Indeed, our world increasingly asks, much as a hand-washing Roman governor once asked Truth to His face, “What is truth?” (John 18:38).

St. Albert the Great: Saintly Scientist for the Modern World

This article is a preview of

“Hounds of the Lord.”

Let us turn now to this great hound of the Lord who chased away countless threatening errors and hunted down an amazing bounty of truths that we so desperately need to reclaim as we examine the thinking of this tireless thinker, the doing of this indomitable doer, and the fervent loving acts of this most learned lover.

Albertus Magnus: Thinker

Born sometime between 1193 and 1206, Albert of Lauingen lived through fourth-fifths of what has been called “the greatest of centuries” and bore the title of Magnus (the Great) while he was still alive . This accolade was due to his incredible breadth of knowledge and mastery of virtually every scientific discipline known to man at the time — literally from A to Z, with contributions to fields as diverse as anatomy, anthropology, astronomy, biology, botany, chemistry, dentistry, geography, geology, medicine, physiology, physics, psychology, and zoology. Some said that Albert knew all that there was to know! Indeed, Albert’s knowledge as a scientist was matched by his knowledge of philosophy and theology too. He became the world’s foremost academic professor and a hound of the Lord all the while.

So how did Great Albert get to be so great? To examine Saint Albert the thinker, we should start with young Albert the student. Albert’s parents were of the lower nobility and apparently died when he and his siblings were relatively young. Albert was raised by his uncle. Although we don’t have much detail on his early education, formal education was fairly rare at the time, a blessing reserved to the relatively well off and provided by teachers at the local cathedral or monastery. He would have likely received the lasting benefits of a medieval system of education based on the seven classical liberal arts. These consisted in the first years of the trivium (from tri, “three,” and via, “roads”) of grammar, dialectics or logic, and rhetoric, and later, of the quadrivium (four roads) of music theory, astronomy, geometry, and mathematics. Greek and Roman educators believed the trivium provided the fundamental tools for thinking that prepared one for adult life and that set the stage for all future specialized knowledge. Medieval educators agreed (and perhaps we would be better off if more modern ones did too!) .

By learning the nature of inflected Latin, Albert grew to understand the fundamental nature of all languages. By learning logic, he discovered how to differentiate valid from invalid arguments and truths from falsehoods, so essential to Scholastic methods of higher education. By learning rhetoric, he saw the importance of carefully defining terms, the importance of a powerful memory, and the necessity of and methods for tailoring one’s preaching or teaching to one’s audience. We can see that the trivium was anything but trivial to Albert, since as a young man he chose to hone these tools of learning further by pursuing advanced education in the trivium and quadrivium at the University of Padua, the world’s foremost center of learning of the liberal arts.

Albert’s interest in learning was by no means limited to the formal classroom either. He was constantly enthralled by the creation all around him, showing great interest in plants, in animals of all sorts, including the fish in the Danube, in the terrain of the earth, and in the motion of the heavens. Indeed, it has been said that one could repopulate the forests of Bavaria with the plants and animals that would be described in Albert’s books.

Struggling student?

Some interesting legends surround Albert’s early academic career as a student. One suggests that young Albert was not exactly a whiz kid, perhaps providing hope for those with high hopes and average intelligence! The story holds that early on at Padua, Albert had a hard time learning science. Everything that he had learned in the evening seemed to vanish from his mind by the time he woke up the next morning. Then one day his room shone brightly as Saints Catherine and Barbara and the Holy Virgin Mary suddenly appeared before him. The Blessed Mother asked him what he desired, and Albert responded by asking her for vast knowledge of human wisdom. The Holy Virgin responded that she would give him philosophical learning without equal.Further, addressing a common concern of the day, she told Albert that his human knowledge would never draw him away from the Faith. Finally, she told him that before the end of his life on earth, his knowledge would leave him and he would return to God as simple and innocent as a child.

The biographer Joachim Sighart speculates that stories about Albert’s difficulties in learning may have arisen because he spent so long in his studies. Saint Dominic, for example, with less interest in scientific knowledge, studied philosophy for six years, while Saint Albert’s philosophical studies may have lasted as long as ten years. Further, Saint Albert himself had written that he always felt inspired to study by the Virgin Mary and what he could not master through study came to him through prayer.

Talented Teacher

Nonetheless, by the time young Albert’s studies were over, the stories of Albert the struggling student were replaced by stories of Albert as the most talented teacher of all. Saint Thomas Aquinas, commenting on Aristotle, wrote that “a characteristic of one possessing Science is his ability to teach,” and Albert taught like few before him or since . When his philosophical and theological training were complete around 1233, Albert attained the title of lector (reader) of theology at the Dominican convent of Cologne, Germany, about three hundred miles east of Paris. Seven years later, after organizing Dominican convent schools in Hildeshiem and Freiburg as well, he would be sent back those three hundred miles west to the home base of Dominican education and indeed the greatest center of learning in the world, the University of Paris, where he would ascend from lector to doctor, having attained the highest and foremost of academic degrees in 1244. That same year, the world’s most talented teacher met the world’s most studious student, when our next chapter’s subject joined Saint Albert in Paris.

In 1248 Albert was appointed regent at a new Studium Generale back in Cologne. Our learned hounds of the Lord had multiplied so rapidly that the order’s only center of higher studies at the Convent of Saint James in Paris could hardly kennel and train all four hundred to five hundred of them! One of the goals of the order’s general chapter meeting in Paris that year was to establish additional houses of higher study in several Dominican provinces at Bologna for Italy, Montpellier for Provence, Oxford for England, and Cologne for Germany. Who better to establish the Dominican mini university of Cologne than Great Albert of Cologne himself? (And who better to accompany him as his aid than the young Thomas Aquinas?) There at Cologne, Albert’s genius, as well as his sanctity, and the “force of his doctrine” drew students and scholars from around the world. It is no surprise, then, that two years later we find Albert at Vincennes in northern France, helping draft the official system of study for the Order of Preachers.

Profound Philosopher

As a teacher, Albert deftly passed on to his students the fruits of his contemplation, and his formalized scientific and philosophical contemplation of the works of creation continued well into his eighth decade. Albert not only studied and passed on what great thinkers had unearthed; he unearthed a good deal of new knowledge of his own. He introduced the brilliant works of Aristotle to the West in his meticulous, line-by-line commentaries on many of Aristotle’s works, works that some feared threatened the Faith, since Aristotle reasoned, for example, that the universe was eternal and that God did not take interest in human affairs. Albert faithfully reported what Aristotle truly taught, the bulk of it being magnificent and in harmony with the truths of the Church. In his own later works, Albert was anything but a parrot of Aristotle’s opinions in science and philosophy, however, contradicting him at times in specific matters (e .g ., the frequency of lunar rainbows, the number of human ribs, and the dietary preferences of eels!) through his own experience or experimentation. Indeed, Albert even wrote a treatise on Aristotle’s errors.

In the fields of science, or “natural philosophy,” Albert was without peer in his day in his research and prolific writing; he wrote entire books on animals, vegetables, and minerals, for a few examples. His knowledge of chemistry and mineralogy sprouted myths that Albert was a great magician. Indeed, books about Albertus Magnus as magician (perhaps in part confusing magnus, “great,” with magus, “magician”) are still on the market today!

Memory master

Albert probed deeply into the realm of philosophical psychology as well, wresting deep secrets of the nature of the human soul in its passions or emotions, intellect, and will. To highlight in brief an area of special interest to me, Albert played a pivotal role in the history of mnemonics, or memory improvement techniques. An ancient work on the “method of loci,” a system of memory improvement using graphic mental visual images and a series of imagined locations as an ordering technique was attributed to the poet Simonides (sixth century B .C .) and had been passed on from ancient Greece and Rome in the surviving writings of Marcus Tullius Cicero (first century B .C .). A separate ancient work on the nature of the workings of human memory had come down through the writings of Aristotle. Saint Albert went over them both with the fine-toothed comb of his intellect and successfully merged these two ancient streams of knowledge on memory improvement and on the nature of memory, providing a rushing river of insights into both. Further, while the memory improvement methods were historically used primarily as effective aids to public speaking (not by memorizing speeches word for word, but for keeping one’s key points, the outline of one’s talk more or less, in one’s mind in its exact order), Saint Albert moved them as well into the realm of ethical behavior.

In Albert’s great moral treatise De Bono (On the Good), when writing about the parts or components of the virtue of prudence, or practical wisdom, Albert borrowed Cicero’s three parts of memory, understanding, and foresight, for to achieve ethical goals in the future, we must act on our present understanding, based on what we have learned in the past. Indeed, Albert would consider memory the most important part of the virtue of prudence, and he would, in no uncertain terms, recommend formal memory training as an ethical endeavor:

Whence we say that among all those things which point towards ethical wisdom, the most necessary is trained memory, because from past events we are guided in the present and the future, and not from the converse.

And as for the particular “method of loci” endorsed by Cicero (Tully), Albert would make clear:

We say that art of memory is best which Tully teaches, above all with respect to those things-for-remembering which pertain to how we live and to justice, and these memories chiefly relate to ethics, it is necessary that this art be within the soul through corporeal images; in these images however it will not remain except within the memory.

Albert was one of history’s greatest thinkers . We have provided but the smallest of nutshells here, although the mighty oak of his encyclopedic knowledge can’t help but be seen in how it branched out far and wide into his activities as a doer and a thinker.

Note: This article is adapted from a chapter in Dr. Vost’s Hounds of the Lord: Great Dominican Saints Every Catholic Should Know, which is available from Sophia Institute Press.

ST. ALBERT THE GREAT

(ca. 1200-1280)

Patron Saint of the UST College of Science

Born in the thirteenth century Germany, St. Albert the Great was still young when he went to Padua in Italy to devote himself to the study of the so-called "liberal arts": grammar, rhetoric, dialectics, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music, demonstrating characteristic interest in the natural sciences which was soon to become the favorite field for his specialization. Though his decision was gradual, he later joined the Order of Preachers. Albert’s intense relationship with God and the example of the holiness and preaching of the Dominican friars were the decisive factors that helped him to overcome every doubt and even to surmount his family's resistance to his vocation.

After his ordination to the priesthood, the brilliant St. Albert taught at various theological centers. He brought with him from Paris an exceptional student, St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274). The sole merit of having been the teacher of St. Thomas would suffice to elicit profound admiration for St. Albert. A relationship of mutual esteem and friendship developed between these two great theologians, human attitudes that were very helpful in the development of this branch of knowledge. St. Albert was later elected as Provincial of the Teutonic Province, where he distinguished himself for the zeal with which he exercised this ministry, visiting the communities and constantly recalling his confreres to fidelity, to the teaching and example of St. Dominic. Eventually, Pope Alexander IV appointed Albert Bishop of Regensburg, where he succeeded in restoring peace and harmony, in reorganizing parishes and convents and in giving a new impetus to charitable activities. After four years, he returned to teaching, researching and writing. He played an important part in the Council of Lyons (1274), and he worked to clarify and defend the teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas.

St. Albert the Great passed away in his room in Cologne, Germany in the year 1280. He was beatified in 1622 and was canonized in 1931, when Pope Pius XI proclaimed him ‘Doctor of the Church’. This was certainly an appropriate recognition of this great man of God and outstanding scholar, not only of the truths of the faith but of the many other branches of knowledge; indeed, with a glance at the titles of his very numerous works, we realize that there was something miraculous about his culture and that his encyclopedic interests led him not only to concern himself with philosophy and theology, but also with every other discipline then known, from physics to chemistry, from astronomy to minerology, from mathematics to psychology, from botany to zoology. For this reason, Pope Pius XII named him ‘Patron of the Enthusiasts of the Natural Sciences’, and also called him "Doctor universalis" precisely because of the vastness of his interests and knowledge.

Prayer to St. Albert the Great

St. Albert the Great, | pray for us!

Sources:

Weisheipl, James A., "The Life and Works of St. Albert the Great", in Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, Studies and Texts, 49, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1980.

Pope Benedict XVI, General Audience: St. Albert the Great, Vatican City, 24 March 2010.

Prepared by Rev. Fr. Louie R. Coronel, OP